OWL's DocumentProcessingToolkit contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the extract_document_content tool that fetches caller-supplied URLs with no scheme, host, or IP filtering. Attackers can inject malicious URLs through prompt injection to make the server fetch internal resources, with responses returned to the agent context.

Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.37.0, Prowler's HTML output formatter in prowler/lib/outputs/html/html.py inserted finding.resource_tags, assembled by unroll_dict and parse_html_string, into generated reports without HTML escaping, allowing a cloud principal who can modify a scanned resource tag to store HTML or JavaScript that executes when another user opens the report. This issue is fixed in version 5.37.0.

Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.36.0, the Kubernetes provider connection test accepted kubeconfig_content containing a legacy gcp auth-provider with config.cmd-path and config.cmd-args because kubeconfig_contains_exec_auth in api/src/backend/api/v1/serializers.py checked only exec blocks, and POST /api/v1/providers/{id}/connection loaded it through config.load_kube_config_from_dict in prowler/providers/kubernetes/kubernetes_provider.py, causing kubernetes-python CommandTokenSource.token to run the attacker-supplied command through subprocess.Popen on the shared worker. This issue is fixed in version 5.36.0.

Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.33.1, an authenticated user with Lighthouse provider configuration access could supply an unvalidated base_url for the openai_compatible provider through POST /api/v1/lighthouse/providers and POST /api/v1/lighthouse/providers/{id}/connection, causing api/src/backend/tasks/jobs/lighthouse_providers.py to send outbound requests, including the API key in the Authorization header, to attacker-controlled or internal endpoints when client.models.list was called. This issue is fixed in version 5.33.1.

Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.30.3, Prowler's SAML authentication flow trusted the email domain asserted in a SAMLResponse when deciding which tenant should receive the final token, and the ACS finish logic in api/src/backend/api/v1/views.py recalculated the tenant from user.email instead of binding token issuance to the validated SAML configuration. An authenticated attacker with a controlled SAML IdP could complete a valid SAML flow for an attacker-controlled domain while asserting an email address from another configured domain, causing a SAMLToken and tenant-scoped JWT to be issued for the wrong tenant and enabling cross-tenant account takeover. This issue is fixed in version 5.30.3.