Nixpkgs Security Tracker

Login with GitHub

Suggestions search

With package: discourse-mail-receiver

Found 31 matching suggestions

View:
Compact
Detailed
Untriaged
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse missing permission check for policy creation in discourse-policy

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, users who do not belong to the allowed policy creation groups can create functional policy acceptance widgets in posts under the right conditions. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. As a workaround, disable the discourse-policy plugin by disabling the `policy_enabled` site setting.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-27454
5.3 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version: 3.1
  • Attack vector (AV): NETWORK
  • Attack complexity (AC): LOW
  • Privileges required (PR): NONE
  • User interaction (UI): NONE
  • Scope (S): UNCHANGED
  • Confidentiality impact (C): LOW
  • Integrity impact (I): NONE
  • Availability impact (A): NONE
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse has check revision visibility on posts endpoint

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, requesting /posts/:id.json?version=X bypassed authorization checks on post revisions. The display_post method called post.revert_to directly without verifying whether the revision was hidden or if the user had permission to view edit history. This meant hidden revisions (intentionally concealed by staff) could be read by any user by simply enumerating version numbers. Starting in versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, Discourse looks up the PostRevision and call guardian.ensure_can_see! before reverting, consistent with how the /posts/:id/revisions/:revision endpoint already authorizes access. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-33408
2.2 LOW
  • CVSS version: 3.1
  • Attack vector (AV): NETWORK
  • Attack complexity (AC): HIGH
  • Privileges required (PR): HIGH
  • User interaction (UI): NONE
  • Scope (S): UNCHANGED
  • Confidentiality impact (C): LOW
  • Integrity impact (I): NONE
  • Availability impact (A): NONE
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse has Improper Authorization in "Post Edits" Report For Moderators

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, moderators were able to see the first 40 characters of post edits in PMs and private categories. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse Vulnerable to Stored XSS via Shared AI Conversation Onebox

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, the onebox method in the SharedAiConversation model renders the conversation title directly into HTML without proper sanitization. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. As a workaround, tighten access by changing the `ai_bot_public_sharing_allowed_groups` site setting.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse discloses restricted post-action counts to non-privileged users

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2, a restriction bypass allows restricted post action counts to be disclosed to non-privileged users through a carefully crafted request. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-33410
5.4 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version: 3.1
  • Attack vector (AV): NETWORK
  • Attack complexity (AC): LOW
  • Privileges required (PR): LOW
  • User interaction (UI): NONE
  • Scope (S): UNCHANGED
  • Confidentiality impact (C): LOW
  • Integrity impact (I): LOW
  • Availability impact (A): NONE
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse hardens chat DM channel creation and expansion

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 have two authorization issues in the chat direct message API. First, when creating a direct message channel or adding users to an existing one, the `target_groups` parameter was passed directly to the user resolution query without checking group or member visibility for the acting user. An authenticated chat user could craft an API request with a known private/hidden group name and receive a channel containing that group's members, leaking their identities. Second, `can_chat?` only checked group membership, not the `chat_enabled` user preference. A chat-disabled user could create or query DM channels between other users via the direct messages API, potentially exposing private `last_message` content from the serialized channel response. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse vulnerable to group membership addition permission bypass via discourse-policy plugin

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 have a security flaw in the discourse-policy plugin which allowed a user with policy creation permission to gain membership access to any private/restricted groups. Once membership to a private/restricted group has been obtained, the user will be able to read private topics that only the group has access to. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. As a workaround, review all policies for the use of `add-users-to-group` and temporarily remove the attribute from the policy. Alternatively, disable the discourse-policy plugin by disabling the `policy_enabled` site setting.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
created 1 week, 3 days ago
Discourse leaks private topic title and post excerpt via user action API endpoint

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 have a lack of visibility checks with a user action API endpoint that results in disclosure of the title and post excerpt to unauthorized users, leading to information disclosure. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Affected products

discourse
  • === 2026.3.0-latest
  • ==>= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.1
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.2

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2025-68933
6.9 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version: 3.1
  • Attack vector (AV): NETWORK
  • Attack complexity (AC): LOW
  • Privileges required (PR): HIGH
  • User interaction (UI): REQUIRED
  • Scope (S): CHANGED
  • Confidentiality impact (C): LOW
  • Integrity impact (I): HIGH
  • Availability impact (A): NONE
created 2 months ago
Discourse non-admin moderators can exfiltrate private content via post ownership transfer

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. In versions prior to 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0, non-admin moderators with the `moderators_change_post_ownership` setting enabled can change ownership of posts in private messages and restricted categories they cannot access, then export their data to view the content. This is a broken access control vulnerability affecting sites that grant moderators post ownership transfer permissions. This issue is patched in versions 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0. The patch adds visibility checks for both the topic and posts before allowing ownership transfer. As a workaround, disable the `moderators_change_post_ownership` site setting to prevent non-admin moderators from using the post ownership transfer feature.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2025.12.0-latest, < 2025.12.1
  • ==>= 2025.11.0-latest, < 2025.11.2
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.0
  • ==< 3.5.4

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers

Untriaged
Permalink CVE-2026-24742
6.5 MEDIUM
  • CVSS version: 3.1
  • Attack vector (AV): NETWORK
  • Attack complexity (AC): LOW
  • Privileges required (PR): LOW
  • User interaction (UI): NONE
  • Scope (S): UNCHANGED
  • Confidentiality impact (C): HIGH
  • Integrity impact (I): NONE
  • Availability impact (A): NONE
created 2 months ago
Discourse staff action logs expose sensitive information to moderators

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. In versions prior to 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0, non-admin moderators can view sensitive information in staff action logs that should be restricted to administrators only. The exposed information includes webhook payload URLs and secrets, API key details, site setting changes, private message content, restricted category names and structures, and private chat channel titles. This allows moderators to bypass intended access controls and extract confidential data by monitoring the staff action logs. With leaked webhook secrets, an attacker could potentially spoof webhook events to integrated services. This issue is patched in versions 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0. As a workaround, site administrators should review and limit moderator appointments to fully trusted users. There is no configuration-based workaround to prevent this access.

Affected products

discourse
  • ==>= 2025.12.0-latest, < 2025.12.1
  • ==>= 2025.11.0-latest, < 2025.11.2
  • ==>= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.0
  • ==< 3.5.4

Matching in nixpkgs

Package maintainers